October 18, 2009
How They Responded
By James Wilson

Thanks to everyone who forwarded their Congressional replies to our three questions in the Mexican Civil War campaign. As you may recall, the questions were:

You've sworn an oath to protect the Constitution, so could you please answer three questions. 1. Where does the Constitution authorize the federal government to wage a War on Drugs? 2. If alcohol prohibition required a Constitutional Amendment, how does prohibiting other drugs NOT require a Constitutional Amendment? 3. Shouldn't we be allowed to learn what works best by having states with different drug laws, or NO drug laws, in keeping with the 10th Amendment? I would appreciate an honest, thoughtful response.

Regrettably, no response we've received actually answered our questions. Most members ignored the Constitutional question and trumpeted their support for the Drug War.

For instance, Sen. Lieberman wrote to Connecticut Downsizers, "I regret that we see this issue from different points of view." He then detailed his support for various aspects of the Drug War.

But the question isn't whether the War on Drugs is good policy, the question is where does the Constitution authorize it.

Sen. Kohl danced around the Constitution. He wrote,

Our founding fathers left the Constitution open for interpretation, and knew that there was still more to be outlined when it was ratified in 1787. Amendments and interpretations of the Constitution are taken very seriously by government officials in all three branches of government.

Yes, but Senator, what is YOUR interpretation?

If members of Congress can't justify their actions on Constitutional grounds, they are essentially advocating tyranny and lawlessness. That's why we will keep pressing. If friends of liberty and the Constitution provide growing, relentless, resistance-numbing pressure, Congress will bend in our direction.

We will pursue this issue by demanding Congress pass the Enumerated Powers Act (EPA). You can send a letter telling Congress of your support for the EPA here.

And, if you do receive a response from your representative or senator about the Constitutionality of the Drug War, we'd like to hear about it in the comments section below.

Filed under Civil Liberties, Health
Blog commenting is currently under construction. In the meantime, you can send an email if there's something you'd like to tell us.

What Can We Do For You?

We can help you downsize the federal government, if you want that. All you have to do is join. It's free! In return...

We'll give you an army.

We're recruiting a huge army of supporters to work for what you want.

We'll give you influence.

The Downsize DC Army will exert relentless, resistance-numbing pressure on Congress.

We'll make your voice heard.

We'll use our growing army to make your beliefs heard by everyone, everywhere, every day.

We'll give you winning strategies.

Ideas like our "Read the Bills Act" and the "One Subject at a Time Act" will give you the leverage to win the public debate, control Congress, and Downsize DC!

We'll give you powerful tools.

  • Your free membership includes a subscription to our free email newsletter, the Consent Chronicle, which national talk show host Jerry Hughes calls by far the best newsletter he receives.
  • You'll be able to use our Educate the Powerful SystemSM to pressure Congress. It's easy. All it takes is a few mouse clicks and keyboard strokes. You can do it in your bathrobe while you're drinking your morning coffee, or during a break at work.
  • You'll also gain access to our 16-page strategy document, "The Downsize DC Vision." You'll learn about important insights like "ignoring an axiom," and powerful strategies like "picking off the herd." One reader called this document "the unified field theory" of political change.

To gain these benefits, just enter your email address in the box below and hit Subscribe!

Subscribe to the Consent Chronicle
Enter your email address twice: