DownsizeDC.org
November 7, 2016
How U.S. politicians helped create the Soviet Union
By Perry Willis

Did U.S. policies play a role in creating the communist threat? Retweet

By Perry Willis [3 Points - Politicians & War]

I’ve been writing a series of articles reviewing U.S. wars and interventions....

Now comes...

Did U.S. intervention in WW1 help create the Soviet Union?

The answer is yes. To understand why, you must appreciate something that most people don’t understand...

There were TWO Russian revolutions, NOT just one!

Both revolutions happened because of WW1.

  • The Kerensky revolution deposed the Czar because the war was going badly.
  • The Bolshevik revolution succeeded because the Kerensky government continued the war past the point where the people supported it. Only the Bolsheviks were proposing peace, so they triumphed.

This view of what happened is uncontroversial. Kerensky himself thought that continuing the war was the crucial mistake. He said as much during an interview with British newspaper publisher Lord Beaverbrook...

Beaverbrook: What would have happened if you had made peace with Germany?
Kerensky: Of course we’d be in Moscow now (not in exile). [Soviet Founders]

In other words, there would've been no Soviet Union if Kerensky had made peace with Germany (see page 316 of Comrades by Brian Moynahan). Historians like Edward Crankshaw agree. He wrote in the “The Atlantic” (October, 1954)...

“The Provisional (Kerensky) Government, if it had immediately sued for peace with Germany...could have remained in power, leading Russia into some kind of democratic system. But because it held to the war...because it knew it would depend in future on the favors of the Entente (Britain, France, and the U.S.)...it could not begin to alleviate the misery of the people, greatly aggravated by the war. It was this misery which Lenin deliberately set himself out to exploit.”

So what role did U.S. politicians play in these matters?

U.S. intervention extended the war, providing time for the Bolshevik revolution to happen. Remember the points made in my previous article...

  • Nearly 1,000 days passed between the start of WW1 and U.S.entry on April 6, 1917
  • Neither side had gained any advantage. “Breakthroughs” were measured in yards or miles, and quickly reversed
  • Between April 16 and mid-May, 1917 nearly half the French army mutinied
  • Similar things were happening on the Russian front in 1917

The war was clearly winding down. It appeared likely to end in a draw. So why didn’t it end? What gave The Great War nearly two more years of life, providing time for Lenin to create the Soviet Union? The answer is chilling...

U.S. involvement made new dreams of victory possible for Britain, France, and Russia fueled by U.S. dollars and lives.

But Germany had a reaction too. Please notice something...

Germany sent Lenin to Russia in a sealed train a mere ten days after the U.S. declaration of war. Consider the logic of that...

  • The Germans had just gained the United States as a new enemy
  • Perhaps they could compensate by losing an old enemy -- Russia
  • Lenin pledged to take Russia out of the war, so the Germans gave him money and sent him back for that purpose

The Germans probably would have done this anyway. It made strategic sense given the Russian revolution that had begun in February. But it became even more urgent after the U.S. entered the war. There are obvious connections between...

  • The U.S. entry into the war
  • The Germans use of Lenin as a tool
  • Kerensky’s continuation of the war
  • The ultimate triumph of the Bolshevik revolution

Please recall what Edward Crankshaw said in the quote above...

  • The Kerensky government continued the war because it expected future support from its allies, including its wealthy new friend, the United States of America
  • Lenin exploited the war to gain power

But U.S. politicians aided the formation of the Soviet Union in one other way. Recall that...

Britain and France were dependent on U.S. supplies and money to continue fighting. U.S. politicians could have stopped the war simply by prohibiting trade and loans for Britain and France. Which is worse? Ending trade that was enabling the commission of a crime, or sending innocent young Americans to die by participating directly in that crime?

U.S. politicians chose the worst option.

It’s a simple fact -- U.S. politicians could have forced a peace settlement long before the Germans sent Lenin back to Russia. Think of the consequences! Think how much better the world would have been had the Soviet Union never been born. That likely would have meant...

Hundreds of millions of lives might have been saved, and untold poverty and misery might have been avoided, if only the U.S. had not intervened in WW1. Alas, the harm caused by that intervention does not end there. In the next article, we’ll examine how U.S. politicians helped co-found Nazi Germany.

Thank you for being an ACTIVE DC Downsizer.

Perry Willis
Co-founder, Downsize DC
Co-creator, Zero Aggression Project

P.S. Previous articles in this series include...

PPS: Here’s a list of books I’ve consulted in this series. If you buy these books using the links below, Downsize DC will get credit we can use to expand our research library. Thank you for your interest and support.

The Russian Revolution

World War 1

The Spanish-American War, the conquest of the Philippines, and Teddy Roosevelt’s betrayal of Korea...

The Mexican War

Blog commenting is currently under construction. In the meantime, you can send an email if there's something you'd like to tell us.

What Can We Do For You?

We can help you downsize the federal government, if you want that. All you have to do is join. It's free! In return...

We'll give you an army.

We're recruiting a huge army of supporters to work for what you want.

We'll give you influence.

The Downsize DC Army will exert relentless, resistance-numbing pressure on Congress.

We'll make your voice heard.

We'll use our growing army to make your beliefs heard by everyone, everywhere, every day.

We'll give you winning strategies.

Ideas like our "Read the Bills Act" and the "One Subject at a Time Act" will give you the leverage to win the public debate, control Congress, and Downsize DC!

We'll give you powerful tools.

  • Your free membership includes a subscription to our free email newsletter, the Consent Chronicle, which national talk show host Jerry Hughes calls by far the best newsletter he receives.
  • You'll be able to use our Educate the Powerful SystemSM to pressure Congress. It's easy. All it takes is a few mouse clicks and keyboard strokes. You can do it in your bathrobe while you're drinking your morning coffee, or during a break at work.
  • You'll also gain access to our 16-page strategy document, "The Downsize DC Vision." You'll learn about important insights like "ignoring an axiom," and powerful strategies like "picking off the herd." One reader called this document "the unified field theory" of political change.

To gain these benefits, just enter your email address in the box below and hit Subscribe!

Subscribe to the Consent Chronicle
Enter your email address twice: