The Read the Bills Act (RTBA)

NOTE: You can read the full text of the "Read the Bills Act" here, in PDF format.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse for citizens. Neither should it be in Congress.

With great power comes great responsibility. The obligations imposed on public servants must always be greater than those imposed on citizens. This is why we need's "Read the Bills Act" (RTBA).

Representatives have a fiduciary responsibility to read every word of every law they seek to impose on us. RTBA requires that . . .

Any member of Congress wishing to cast an affirmative vote for more spending, greater regulation, or the creation or retention of a program or bureaucracy, must sign an affidavit swearing that he or she has either . . .

  • Read the entire bill, or . . .
  • Heard the entire bill read.

It will always be easy for every member of Congress to hear a full reading of a bill because RTBA requires such a reading before a quorum of each chamber of Congress.This requirement for a quorum reading is by far the most important reform contained in this bill. Here's why . . .

The quorum reading requirement means that all floor business will halt while a Constitutional quorum is present for a full, literal, word-for-word, in-order, reading of the entire bill. This one simple requirement will change how Congress operates. As it stands now, too many bills . . .

  • Are passed too quickly with too little understanding, debate, and deliberation
  • Are too long, too dense, and contain too many subjects

The quorum reading requirement will fix these problems. It will make Congress . . .

  • Slow down
  • Debate
  • Deliberate
  • And better understand the burdens they seek to impose on the American people

In short, the quorum reading requirement will give Congress a huge incentive to make bills shorter, clearer, and more focused, so that the members of Congress can better endure the fatigue of hearing them read!

No mere rule, or three day waiting period (which the House has already passed) can accomplish any of these things. In addition . . .

RTBA requires that each part of a bill that amends present law must quote the existing law to be amended, and the new section as amended. It will no longer suffice to have something like the following . . .

"Section 415 (21 U.S.C. 350d) is amended in subsection (a)(2), by inserting after the first sentence the following: . . ."

This is yet another feature of RTBA that will make things easier for both Congress and the public.

RTBA also imposes waiting periods . . .

  • After the quorum reading Congress must wait seven (7) days before the final vote.
  • The bill must also be posted online during that period so that the press, the public, and watchdog groups can read the legislation too.
  • The vote must be publicly scheduled on the Internet for a date certain, seven (7) days in advance.

These provisions will end the practice of legislating by surprise, and give citizens the same time for reading and deliberating that Congress has.

Finally, RTBA has several mechanisms to compel compliance. We'll just note two here . . .

First, RTBA is a law, NOT a mere rule. The evidence is overwhelming that Congress doesn’t obey rules. Enforceable laws are needed instead. This problem of enforcement is also why RTBA permits no exceptions for "emergencies." "Emergency" has become an accounting term on Capitol Hill — a way to work outside the constraints of current budget law.

Example: The Iraq war was funded, every single year, from the emergency budget. And the emergency supplemental bill was (coincidentally?) noted for its profligate pork-barrel spending and earmarks. Everyone on Capitol Hill understood the purpose of the budget law. The leadership knew they were violating the spirit of it by passing the emergency supplemental. They did it anyway. That's just one example of why Congress needs to be regulated. To do that, we need a firm law.

Second, Congressional rules can't be enforced by the courts. Properly written laws can be. That's why RTBA contains the following enforcement mechanism . . .

Any law enacted in violation of any provision of RTBA, OSTA, or WTLA can be considered invalid in a court of law. How?

All citizens will have a sufficient defense, when charged in court by presenting evidence that the law they're accused of violating was passed in violations of RTBA, rendering the law null and void.

No mere rule can be enforced in this way. Only a law can give citizens this kind of protection.

In conclusion . . .

If the citizens Congress supposedly serves must be responsible for obeying and paying for every word of every law Congress enacts, then every member of Congress must be responsible for reading every word of every bill before they vote to pass it.

Submission Committee:
Leo Hamel • R W Kerr • Paul Davis • Winnona Christeson • Thomas Fultz • Peter R. Abeln • David Chapman • Donald D. Franklin • Jim Fuller • Gregory Utas • Robert S. Moore • Leslie C. Hardison • Daniel J. Dunn • Craig B. Googan • Benjamin Rousch • James D. Meyer • James Marquart • Stephanie Adams • Lisa Z. Morgan • David C. Ripley • Robert W. Shubring • Clarence Garnder • Stan Jones • Russell J. Kominski • Melanie Marshall • Jeffrey S. Schulman, Jr. • Maria Spicer • Dan Steelandt • William W. Bell • David W. Landram • V.K. Benson • Frank Bowman • Jessica Hathaway • Joseph Hegener • Beck Horne • Matthew M. Hosler • Geoffrey H. Hunter • Shane Killian • Owen Mann • Thomas E. Regneir • Leslie J. Russell • Kempes Trager • Mary Warner • Kevin C. Kuhns • Peter Skaates • Craig P. Thompson • George R. Whitfield • Bernard S. Browning • Jacob Burckhardt • Michael Ciulla • Kerry G. Daniel • Marc L. Guttman • Robert L. Morgan • Ken Mosher • Randy Norton • Victoria E. Pate • Joel G. Rauch • John Schultz • Kirk Singh • Edward W. Sudduth • Emil R. Wolanski • Dr. Warren Barr • Richard K. Chaplin • David Erickson • Dorsey J. Glenn • Kenneth Obenski • Zach Sycks • Michael T. Foley • Shal Loeser • Kay Samalin • Charles Braly Distributors • Daniel Edgar • Robert G. Howard • Robert Larkin • Thomas Anderson • Eugene L. Bivins • Mann Page Ciesemier • David del Rio • Richard T. Hogan • Ronald G. Holley • Herb C. Johnson • Andrew Marold • Robert C. Sheets • Judith A. Shellabarger • Chris Taylor • David A. Eckhardt • Andrew D. Bourdon • Brian R. Key • Mike Spalding • Andrew L. Sullivan • Nancy Woods • Duane Bates • Constitution Party of WA • Anthony J. Diliberto • Kamarat McWashington • Dr. Mike Rosing • Darrell D. White • Edward J. Wirzulis • Walter Uhlman • Lynn Cunningham • Noel Gibeson • J. Roderick Greig • Louise Javra • Joseph R. Jordan • Robert L. Knowlden • Michael Maloy • Joyce E. Manett • Yuri Mankovskiy • Ruth Matheny • Joe Moorman • Olivier Schreiber • Jermainie J. Schultz • Paul B. Simon • Steven Smith • Christopher K. Walters • Matthew Weigel • James A. West • Verlin Whipple • Gregory A. Wolfe • Gil Magno • Richard Schwartzman • Thomas J. Boyle • Mallory Montgomery • Steven Pilchman

Use the form at right to send your elected representatives a letter about this issue. It's easy!

  • Your position will be counted by each Congressional office,
  • Will educate the Congressional staffer who reads it,
  • May be passed up the chain of command,
  • May receive a reply (many DC Downsizers get them). If you receive such a letter, please share it with us at

Send a letter to Congress

We provide the first few words of the letter so that Congressional offices will see the most important point right at the start, and so that no one can hijack our system for another purpose. Here's the part we provide . . .

I expect my Senators to co-sponsor S. 1571 and strongly encourage my Representative to introduce the Read the Bills Act.
Your ZIP Code is required so we can direct your letter to your representatives in Congress.